Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3418
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMushohwe, Christopher-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T12:37:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-07T12:37:27Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3418-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study is to explore and analyse the challenges of the R2P on the African Continent with respect to the relationship between R2P and the AU Constitutive Act which forms the central research questions. The congruence and contradictions between R2P and AU Act as basis of the research problem are invested. The theoretical framework informs the study of seemingly insincere accepts of the concepts of “sovereignty as responsibility” replacing “sovereignty as absolute political control” by AU member states. This study adopted qualitative research design methodology and data analysis. The key findings of this study were inter alia, the similarities of the thresholds for intervention for R2P and Article 4 (h) of AU Act but with sharp contrast on the implementation matrix question of intervention against humanity. The major recommendations made as part of conflicts prevention and resolution focus in the areas of economic, social, political and security sectors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectR2P (Responsibility to Protect)en_US
dc.subjectAU (African Union)en_US
dc.subjectConstitutive Acten_US
dc.subjectConflicts preventionen_US
dc.subjectConflicts resolutionen_US
dc.subjectThresholds for interventionen_US
dc.titleThe Challenges of the Responsibility to Protect on the African Continent. The Case of Darfuren_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Institute of Peace, Leadership and Governance



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.