Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3809
Title: Implications of the Imago Dei (Gn 1.26) on Gender Equality and Agrarian Land Reform in Zimbabwe
Authors: Mwandayi, Canisius
Keywords: Creation
Jambanja
Image of God
Zimbabwe
Issue Date: Apr-2022
Publisher: AOSIS (African Online Scientific Information Systems)
Citation: Mwandayi, C. (2022). Implications of the imago Dei (Gn 1:26) on gender equality and agrarian land reform in Zimbabwe. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(2), 6 pages. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i2.7688
Series/Report no.: HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies;
Abstract: The creation of humanity (Gn 1:26–2:25) marks the climatic point of the creation process because after it, God is said to have rested. A clear marker that humans are the epitome of creation is the fact that they were created in God’s image (Gn 1:26). Unlike animals, humans have the capacity to think, act with free will, exert self-control and also have a conscience. These distinctive characteristics earn humanity not only dominion over creation (Gn 1:28), but also the care towards the created order. The fact of having been created in God’s image, imago Dei, or to be godlike, is therefore associated with certain rights and responsibilities over creation. Further, being created in God’s image implies that human life itself is sacred and thus should not be terminated in any way, either by the individual themself or by any other person(s) (Gn 9:6). Given that human life is so sacred, such a rationale is invoked in the absolute prohibition on murder. Above all, being created in God’s image connotes gender equality – ‘male and female he created them’ (Gn 1:27b). In view of the land reform exercise in Zimbabwe, so much has happened, but the big question which remains is whether women have received a fair share in the land redistribution exercise. Making a womanist contextual reading of Genesis 1:26, this article seeks to reflect on the Zimbabwean land reform exercise, challenging the lack of gender inclusion in the redistribution exercise.
URI: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3809
ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050
(Print) 0259-9422
Appears in Collections:Institute of Theology and Religious Studies



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.