Caroline

Abstract

This study investigates the economic benefits of enforcing laws against child marriages in Zimunya, Mutare Rural District. The researcher aimed to explore the relationship between the criminalization of child marriages and its effects on the local economy, particularly focusing on household incomes, educational attainment, and employment opportunities. The central research problem addresses whether the enforcement of these laws results in economic benefits or challenges for families and the broader community in Zimunya. To achieve this, the researcher employed qualitative research methods, which included interviews to gather in-depth insights from community members. The sample size consisted of 20 participants, including parents/guardians of child marriage survivors (15), community leaders (3), and representatives from the Department of Social Development (2). Purposive sampling was employed to specifically target individuals with firsthand experience or in-depth knowledge of child marriage, ensuring the study's relevance while optimizing resource use. This approach allowed for a nuanced understanding of the local context and the diverse perspectives of stakeholders, including parents, educators, and community leaders. However, a significant challenge encountered was the sensitivity of the topic, which made some participants uncomfortable sharing their experiences. This discomfort potentially limited the depth of data collected, highlighting the need for careful handling of sensitive issues in future research. The findings indicate that criminalizing child marriages can lead to positive economic outcomes. For instance, increased educational opportunities for girls were noted, as families began to prioritize schooling over early marriages. This shift not only enhances individual prospects but also contributes to the overall economic development of the community by fostering a more educated workforce. Additionally, the study revealed that families who delayed marriages for their daughters experienced improved household incomes, as parents could invest more in education and skills development, leading to better employment opportunities. However, the transition to a legal framework that prohibits child marriages is not without its challenges. The research uncovered resistance from traditional practices and cultural norms that favor early marriages, which can create friction within communities. Some families expressed concerns about the economic benefits of delaying marriages, fearing that it might lead to increased financial burdens. Furthermore, the study highlighted the importance of community engagement and education in addressing these cultural barriers, suggesting that legal enforcement alone may not be sufficient to change deeply rooted practices. The implications of this research suggest that while legal frameworks are essential for protecting children, comprehensive community engagement and support systems are crucial for facilitating the transition and maximizing the benefits of such laws. Policymakers are encouraged to implement educational programs that raise awareness about the long-term benefits of delaying marriage and investing in children's education. The research underscores the complex interplay between legal measures and economic factors in addressing child marriages. The findings advocate for a holistic approach that combines legal enforcement with community education and support to ensure sustainable economic development. The research output does not appear to be patentable, as it primarily consists of qualitative findings and insights rather than a novel invention or process.